Frog-g-g!: 5/10: Frog-g-g is slightly better than the average nature gone wild remake that one usually finds on the Sci-Fi channel running in a movie marathon some rainy Saturday afternoon. (This, by the way, is damning with faint praise.) It has a good sense of fun about it, a real catchy theme song and lipstick lesbian sex scenes. It is also a missed opportunity that tries to do a couple of things and pretty much fails at all of them. For example the lead scientist character is a lesbian. She is played by Kristi Russell who does make a decent movie lesbian. (A movie lesbian is a hot chick who likes to make out with other hot chicks preferably when guys are watching. This should not be confused with non-movie lesbians who have mullets, beer guts, wear hockey jerseys and will kick you ass for looking at them twice.) While there are a couple of brief lesbian sex scenes they seem a bit sisterly. (I really don't mean this in a good way). There is some topless hugging and kissing but nothing that screams good exploitation.Well at least as a parody of 70's nature gone wild movies it works right? Nope. All the parts are here (The scientist hero, her girlfriend, the reluctant sheriff and the big bad industrialist who of course is both the lifeblood of this town and the sheriff's brother-in-law.), but the movie plays it much too straight for a good Airplane style parody. Everything else is downhill from there. The movie has no horror at all and considering the plot consists of a man-sized frog copulating with virgins the exploitation is disappointing. (I'm sorry but when one rents a cheap C-grade Humanoids from the Deep rip-off. One expects a hecatomb of nubile young flesh and gratuitous nudity to boot.)Nevertheless I'm a sucker for nature gone wild movies and movie lesbian sex, no matter how tame, has never hurt a film. Neither has a catchy theme song with the dancing Sleestak.

I don't quite understand some of the introduction as how it pertains to the actual flick; but then again "Who Cares?" I got lost somewhere when the titles were rolling, but I think you would too. What a breath of fresh air if you love B-Movies in the 1970 - Roger Corman vain.Like other Fans posting on here, I agree that there is a degree of acknowledgment for other films such as Humanoids From The Deep. I also saw glimpses of Return of the Living Dead as well. If Kentucky Fried Movie had a section dedicated to just horror films this baby would've been perfect.Above par acting coupled with a decent script and editing made this a fun watch. I am waiting for the sequel; hopefully before I or the idea croak.

This was one great cheesy monster flick. Sort of like an updated, lower budgeted, tongue-in-cheek version of Humanoids From The Deep. You have a horny giant mutant frog, you have naked lesbians, you have action, a love story, everything.Okay, it was real low budget, but the acting wasn't too bad. They probably could have done with a little more money for the frog costume, maybe a few more mutant frogs, but for what they had they did a really good job.And the directing and editing were pretty good. Often with low budget flicks I get distracted by too many static camera long shots and bad pacing, but this film didn't suffer from either of those.If you liked Humandoids, if you groove on Troma, then you'll love this little fun movie.

Okay, just so you know, my first date was sneaking into see "Humanoids From the Deep", so I have a definite soft spot for this sort of thing. But this is a really fun cool movie that my boyfriend (who's not the same guy...but he might as well be!) and I really dug. I think he especially enjoyed the nudity and the very talented and hot ladies who were doing most of the nudity, but we both thought it was really cool and funny and had a great time with it. I mean, this is obviously not "Far From Heaven"...or maybe it is, for monster frogs I mean. Great frog suit and guy in frog suit, by the way. They should have special Oscars for that kind of thing. Great music too. Ribbit!!!!