When brash Texas border officer Mike Norton wrongfully kills and buries the friend and ranch hand of Pete Perkins, the latter is reminded of a promise he made to bury his friend, Melquiades Estrada, in his Mexican home town. He kidnaps Norton and exhumes Estrada's corpse, and the odd caravan sets out on horseback for Mexico.
Similar titles
Reviews
Texas is a beautiful country with a stunning, flat landscape, characteristic people, and, unfortunately, pervasive racism. Although Texas was once a part of Mexico, the political climate of immigration has brought out an ugly side of Texas that lies in stark contrast to the beauty of the state itself. Mexicans are not welcome in Texas. It is with this premise that the "Three Burials of Melquiades Estrada" begins. In the beginning of the film, an undocumented Mexican ranch worker named Melquiades Estrada from the town of Jiménez is unjustly murdered by a trigger-happy border agent in the dry heat of Texas. The scene is particularly haunting since the movie was inspired by the real-life killing in Texas of Esequiel Hernandez Jr. by a United States Marine. The man who kills Estrada is a border agent named Mike Norton who has a penchant for racism and a bad habit of casually raping his wife and brutalizing women. The lines between good and evil are clearly drawn at the beginning of the film. Unfortunately, the law doesn't always recognize this line. As a border agent with a recognized right to carry a firearm and be in the country, Estrada gets murdered and the Norton gets away. Well, almost, anyways. Pete Perkins ensures otherwise. The tough cowboy, who is played by Tommy Lee Jones, learns of Estrada's murder and the following cover up by law enforcement. Not content to let such an injustice go unanswered, in classic western style, Perkins drags Michael Norton and Estrada's corpse all the way from Texas to Jiménez in Mexico while being relentlessly pursued by border agents. On the journey, Perkins forces Norton to come to terms with his racism, his lack of empathy, and the raw injustice of his actions towards Estrada. The two end up developing a strange bond that elevate's Norton's character. Although the film contains stunning visual scenes of both rural Texas and rural Mexico, the real beauty of the film comes out in the ending. Although the "Three Burials of Melquiades Estrada" has all the ingredients to be a classic tale of revenge in the form of a modern western, instead it takes the more difficult route of telling a tale of redemption. Norton, after being shown the error of his ways by Perkins, eventually comes around and is given a second chance. Nobody is too far gone for redemption. That is why the film has the potential to become an instant classic. It is a fitting legacy for the directorial debut of veteran actor Tommy Lee Jones.
Rotten tomatoes all over the place, a minimum of 85% muchos amigo! You see , the great Melquiades Estrada was good friends of Tommie Lee Jones. And you see, such a good friend , he took care that Melquiades got his Mel fuckie fuckie with nice white woman from Border Patrol man . You understand ? If the right honorable Tommie Lee Jones ever comes to TX make sure you beat the craps out of the man, demand he pays $3000 upfront for the cross border fee to Mexico, and kick his ass south right across the border for a retirement without the right to return. The smell of Melquiades Estrada's rotten corpse riddled with anti-freeze and alcohol is still emanating from that self declared town of Jiménez to all the last lost and destitute corners of Mexico. The way the white college boy from Minnesota is mistreated and humiliated inside Three Burials was in old times never observed with folk like John Wayne. At the same time Three Burials is hailed with the NYTimes movie review, Rotten tomatoes awards and even Christian Today in a way that doesn't bode well for the future of TX. The Bill of Rights and declaration of independence was written in English and not Spanish. There is a reason for that. How does civilized spell in Spanish ? After watching this one, i don't even want to know.
Here's the kind of movie that appears every once in a great while that actually makes you think, and more so, reflect on such intrinsic human traits as loyalty, friendship, integrity, and alienation. Coming out as recently as four years ago, it's a film I had never even heard of until it made the rounds on Encore Westerns recently, and even then, it's title didn't interest me enough to tune in at the time. However with the luxury of a few days free time on my hands, I managed to pick it up at my local library. To say that the movie is mesmerizing would be somewhat of an understatement. It's morbid and fascinating at the same time, a slow motion train wreck that begins with the Tarantino-esqe convention of a non-linear story line, then descends into a nightmare reality for it's principal players as the viewer simply can't imagine how it will all turn out.The movie was oddly reminiscent for me of two other films, one from four decades ago, and another quite recent. The picture's early treatment of alienation among it's characters, (Lou Ann and Mike, Rachel and Bob) was as powerful here as it was in 1971's "The Last Picture Show", both taking place in the stark heat and dust of the American Southwest. With a small town population one could virtually count on just a few hands, both films dwell on the notion that "It's always the same, always the same" - with the perverse realization that whatever you do doesn't remain a secret very long. So the indiscretions of a waitress are known to everyone, and stepping outside of the town's comfort zone is a concern for one and all.The other picture that comes to mind is another Tommy Lee Jones vehicle, the recent "No Country For Old Men". Both stories lend themselves to a randomness of events that at any moment threaten to spiral out of control. Gunshot wounds and rattlesnake bites are unseen and unintended consequences of moving in the wrong direction, while even well thought out plans never foresee potential obstacles along the way. With both pictures, you're left with the uncomfortable sense that the Tommy Lee Jones character remains joyless and without direction, even with closure. Both finales are as powerful as they come.It's been a few days now since I've watched 'Three Burials' and I'm still thinking about it. That's in no small measure to those ghastly and grotesque sequences when Pete (Tommy Lee) battles the ants and applies the antifreeze embalming. Is it weird to suppress an involuntary chuckle while at the same time you're going 'WTF'? But there's also the relationship Pete forges and forces with Mike (Barry Pepper) while on the trail to complete his mission. It's a surreal crossroads both men arrive at when Mike asks Pete if he's going to be OK, but no stranger than asking the same question of the man he killed.
i rented this movie for a good night in. and was it a good night in? NO THE MOVIE IS A DISASTOR!!! this film from start to finish is bland boring and there isn't a plot really its just about a fella who shot another fella and the fella who has the blame is dragged around for the whole film.this film is like a project gone wrong. when i first rented it i was expecting a great modern day western with good action or drama to it. instead i got a bad film. watching barney is more electrifying than this!!! the film is just awful!! i don't mean to be ignorant but how did they not see how bad this film actually is when they were making it. it is so so dull and dragged out!!! it could of been a lot a lot a lot better if they added a load of violence and chasing but even at that i don't think anything could of helped this film!