This has to be by far the worse movie of my life time, not authentic in any way shape or form, wrong uniforms, carrying fake guns used for high school honor guard, terrible, did I say terrible acting and directing. Save yourself some time and run now. I have seen high school kids with a camera put out better stuff goofing around. As a member of the military they could at least get the setting, uniforms and equipment right. How anybody can put this out and call this a movie is beyond me. Why netflex or anybody would even list this as a movie baffles the mind. No true plot to boot, just rambles on with no reason to it. I should have been paid for my time just watching this unfortunate piece of work someone tried to pass off as a movie.

This is actually the first time I'm writing a review. While watching this "IMDB bottom top ten nominee" I suddenly feel the need to find answers. OK. Let's say you decide to make a movie. You've got a cam and a couple of buddies. You saw "Southern Comfort" and thought is was shot in the jungle. You never knew the jungle looked just like your local forest! You did some research on adult movies and used the audio of one of them to dub the wounded in your masterpiece. I won't say a word about the acting, the camera-work, weapons or uniforms, there's been enough said about that. I want to know what Joe Black was thinking when he started editing. He saw the raw material and still started editing. Suppose the Bell didn't ring and Joe still thought he was holding gold in his hands. How about the first time he showed it to his buddies? Didn't anybody say it was crap? Did they even stayed until the end? I just don't believe it! Joe must have known this was crap, but hey, you've shot a movie under a thousand bucks and even succeeded in distributing it! You're making money! Joe, you deserve a 10 for achieving this but a 1 for your movie!My review is ready, may I stop the movie now?

Arguably, more money was invested in advertising and promotion than on production. The initial camera work was excruciating to watch, the plot (sic) meandered, the acting was embarrassing and inconsistent; going from poor to dreadful. Almost every aspect was deficient, such as the lighting and camera work. The props were apparently borrowed from the local amateur dramatic society. There was a complete absence of continuity, atmosphere and professionalism.This had the quality of an attempt by cinematography students in their freshman year. The movie style was reminiscent of the Blair Witch Project, without the action.I can not recall watching a worse movie, nor anything close to it. Some investors should be looking to get a refund on this piece of "work". They and the viewing audience were scammed.

Really....did he steal it? He stole valuable minutes of our lives with a fantasy Vietnam film.I say fantasy because NOTHING about this film in any way resembles the RVN that I fought and bled in.And none of his characters would have lasted 1 day in the field.There was no such infantry job as "tunnel rat".Everyone in an infantry platoon sans Platoon: Leader, Sgt and Medic took their turn crawling in holes and walking point.And if any moron puffed a stinking cigar when we were about to engage, I WOULD HAVE SHOT HIM.Most of the so-called Vietnam war movies have no resemblance to what it was like and some like the Rambo and Chuck Norris films bordered on satire.At least they were entertaining and often had SOME bit of help from a consultant.This piece of garbage has NOTHING....... no entertainment value, poor actors, no direction, and a ridiculously dishonest portrayal of wartime Vietnam's jungle.It's amazing that someone could throw away so much money in these hard times.