One of those films that with a slightly better script, some basic technical advice, some better actors, less shaky camera work and better acting....it might have been average. As it is, the film is so bad, I haven't laughed so much in ages and for that it gets a 4! Other reviews point out inaccuracies such as corporal stripes on a Major but for me it was the appalling fight scenes and dialogue that had me chuckling. Every actor in this monstrosity must take some responsibility but the actor playing the baddies moll is one of the most talentless one dimensional I have ever seen.Unless you have time to waste and want a laugh, don't watch it.

I have never seen so many mistakes in a film and I've switched it off at 21 minutes. Main character called by the rank of Major but wearing uniform of a Corporal, salutes like an American soldier and I'll stop there as luckily I've lost ½ and hour of my life not the full hour and a half that the poor people that watched it all have.

Quite possibly one of the worst, most inane, awful films I have ever sat through, wooden acting, awful special effects, obviously fake head- shot stickers were on special during the day it took to film this as opposed to the wardrobe budget which obviously ran out extremely quickly as most of the actors were forced to share the same ill-fitting jacket. appalling dialogue full of unnecessary playground swearing.Truly dreadful!

.....after the first 'He who Dares', who in the name of all that's fair and decent was stupid enough to give the shockingly talent-less Paul Tanter more money to make more of this relentless stupidity.I watched this primarily out of pure morbid curiosity to see if it could actually be worse than the prequel and from that point of view alone it didn't disappoint.The lead character alone is a disaster, he has way too many 'Ricky Gervais in doco mode' style character traits to be taken seriously and is about as menacing as Julian Cleary. This sequel shares it's predecessors style of relentless, pointless and futile killing in a bid to cover up the absurd and utterly pointless story line, the story (if you can call it that) is a 'whose who' of cinematic clichés, you would have thought that after the slagging Tanter got in reviews for the original movie he might have done some technical research before writing/filming another, but no.Example - In one scene the good guy SAS MAJOR strolls into the room in a a uniform with two stripes on the sleeve, REALLY??? Surely someone in a film crew of this size must have known that this is the rank insignia of a corporal, SURELY??? I could ramble on about how utterly f**king dire this movie is but you get the idea.In the interests of fairness the scene outside No.10 where the door gets blown off is f**king great, but a few seconds excitement is not enough to warrant given this utterly awful movie more than 1.If you feel the need to kill yourself after watching this movie simply climb Paul Tanters ego and jump to his IQ.