Edward is busy trying to unlock the secrets of reading and recording people's thoughts. He is very involved with his work leaving little room for girlfriend Britt. Longstreet comes along and offers Edward a place to do his research and have unlimited funding. There are, however, ulterior motives as Edward is also somehow unlocking the secrets of eternal life. If you wanna see naked Pamela Anderson you'll definitely have a good time with 'Naked Souls' but if you're looking for something well made? worth your time and smart? This is not. (0/10)

Indeed, it took less than 6 minutes for Pam to get nude. Then, she did it again in a bed and all along the movie, she kept wearing very revealing clothes (except when she got out of bed!). Beyond, all the female characters get also nude: the wife of the mad scientist, the victims of the serial killers, the model for Pam's art. Well, i admit that both Pam and Seana are really stunning but all this gratuitous nudity is unfortunate (= it adds nothing to the story). However, it's the only thing that matters here because all the rest is crap: * Davis Warner becomes albinos (his face is painted white to underline that his character is old and don't see the daylight often!)* I believe in ghosts, UFOs, Nessy, Bigfoot but the sharing of memories and souls by smoke is utterly stupid! * for a short movie, you kept seeing the same sequences over and over: thus, its runtime isn't 80 minutes but rather 70 or less!But, don't count on me to slap Pam's acting because we need all sorts of acting for all sorts of movies and emotions. I think that Pam is fine because she offers a kind, down to earth personality. Thus, we can share and care for her and it's the basic tool for any artist. Unfortunately, having been labeled the blonde sex-symbol of the 90s, she is despised at first sight and that's not a fair judgment.In conclusion, the only memories of this movie would be those of Pam (and Seana too.)

Naked Souls was described on it's cover as an explicitly erotic thriller, something it is definetly not. It's just the kind of thriller that's made to cash in on Pamela's assets and the kind of wasteful slop you expect to run really late on Monday night television. Still, it does dabble in some really interesting themes and has some surprising plot twists which lift it above the usual B-grade standard. The performances by what could be called a respectable B-grade cast aren't too bad. Krause captures his character quite well, and Dean Stockwell and Pamela Anderson aren't bad in their underused (yes Pamela is underused AGAIN!) supporting roles. Definately NOT an exceptional piece of work, but a vaguely entertaining piece of dismal thriller all the same.

Actually, I though Pamela Anderson was the worst thing (OK, except for eye-appeal...) about it. Her character would be a throw-away except for the gratuitous nudity. Lord, the story wasn't great, but it would have had more continuity without her. Oh yeah, the picture on the video box has nothing to do with the movie ... big surprise?