Nora Moran, a young woman with a difficult and tragic past, is sentenced to die for a murder that she did not commit. She could easily reveal the truth and save her own life, if only it would not damage the lives, careers and reputations of those whom she loves.
Similar titles
Reviews
I like (many) pre-code movies, simply because you never know what might happen. Quite a contrast to the formulaic stuff that was produced after 1935 (approx.) and, for those who think the 'Hayes' code is dead, the assembly-line production of rom-coms since 1990 rigidly stick to the same drivel: about 20 minutes from the end, a disagreement causes the intended couple to split, but miraculously re-unite by the final curtain. Nauseating.Sins of Norah Moran is a bit melodramatic in places, esp. in the early going, but Majestic Studios (one of the so-called 'Poverty Row' film-makers, who rented space and equipment from the mainstream guys to keep costs down) weaved a melancholy tale here of a sad-sack orphan who grows up only to have the 'system' beat her down. She stands accused of murdering a former co-worker at the circus (he sexually assaulted her - a modern screenplay might have her nominated for Congress), and facing a death sentence. Her recent 'governor' boyfriend probably did it, but will Nora blow the whistle? I was struck by how the 'governor', a married man, cavorts so openly with this pretty young girl - were the 'Press' so under control during this era or was there just so much of this 'running-around' going on that the gov could hide in plain sight?In time, he sees her at a 'kept' home every Friday & Monday - it kind of blows up when his wife finds a stack of unsigned love letters. The script makes no effort to condemn Nora or the Governor for their dallying, but, of course, it's poor Nora who will face severe consequences when the villain is suitably dispatched. Dang it-where's Perry Mason when you need him?But that's pre-code: anything can happen. That's what makes it so interesting. Great camera work & use of flashbacks & voice-overs. Experimental. Unorthodox. Compelling. Kudos to TCM for reviving interest in this era. 8/10
Adapted from the play "Burnt Offerings", it was originally produced under the title "The Woman in the Chair" and in the 1980s it was re-released as "Voice From the Grave". Whatever the title it was an extraordinarily strange little film using a stream of consciousness narrative (used the same year by Preston Sturges in "The Power and the Glory") and according to some critics, maybe the best independent feature of the thirties. It definitely would have confused a lot of viewers of the day but as a Majestic release it would have played on the bottom half of double bills, so it may have been a pleasant surprise or a confusing one.Edith Crawford (Claire DuBrey, who played the first Mrs. Rochester in the 1934 version of "Jane Eyre") visits her brother, a District Attorney (Alan Dinehart), determined to find out who her husband, Bill, is having an affair with. The "other woman" is Nora Moran (Zita Johann)who is about to be executed for murder. There is a very confronting scene involving preparations before an execution and then Nora's subconscious mind takes over. After a rather sad childhood, Nora finds herself working in a circus for Paulino (John Miljan), a lecherous lion tamer who rapes her. A year later Nora feels she has found happiness with Bill but Paulino comes back on the scene, hoping to try some blackmail and is killed.There is much "avant garde" film-making in this. Apart from SOC, there are flashbacks within flashbacks (similar to the 1940's movie "The Locket"), eerie appearances - Sarah Padden, as one of Nora's circus friends, suddenly materializes beside her prison bed, as does Nora, who appears to Bill (Paul Cavanaugh), to plead with him not to let her die in vain. (He is really a weak person and Nora begs him to try to be strong for her sake). There is even a bizarre fantasy sequence in which the men in her life discuss events standing around her coffin!!! It is a very strange movie!!Alan Dinehart seems to be the only actor in the movie that you can warm to. He is not particularly a "good guy" but has a dimension to his acting that the other players lack. Zita Johann a stage actress, who D.W. Griffith selected for the female lead in his film "The Struggle", had the intensity but no heart. You somehow can't imagine her as a chorus girl - Mae Clarke would have been perfect, but that is just my opinion. Cora Sue Collins was a child star who seemed to get some plum roles (until Shirley Temple came along) - she had played Greta Garbo as a child in "Queen Christina". She was top billed in a part that only lasted 60 seconds at the most. Henry B. Walthall, was also in the cast as the kindly Father Ryan, who looked after Nora as a child.Recommended.
This film is a great surprise. Apart from being thematically unusual (murder, suicide, corruption, capital punishment, rape, etc) it is visually astonishing and years ahead of its time, anticipating lots of stuff from 40's film noir to art-house European cinema (Bergman's Wild Strawberries for instance).The film uses the `narratage' technique first used the same year by Preston Sturges in `The Power and the Glory' (also a very interesting film, directed by William K. Howard and a clear precedent of `Citizen Kane') which consists of voice-over narration and flashbacks and flashforwards, but if takes it much further with a very complex structure that includes flashbacks within flashbacks, dreams, hallucinations, flashforwards and characters appearing in scenes where they were not originally present and commenting the action with the main character.The film is also extraordinarily shot with quasi expressionistic photography, lots of tracking shots, montages and very imaginative use of stock footage. To make all this even more admirable the film was produced on a very low B budget and it runs only 65 minutes.
This film's not quite what you expect from 1933, the trailer boasts that it uses the famous 'narratage' technique from Preston Sturges's The Power and Glory, with Flashbacks and narration; then Flashbacks within Flashbacks. At just sixty five minutes the plot twists are great and the old fashioned dialog is really quite funny.Made on a tight budget, it manages to look like a bigger movie using library footage and cleaver back projection. Overall well worth watching just for the novelty value.