Having read the book I remember watching the original 1981 series and being quite impressed. It was near enough to a fantastical but still believable post-apocolyptic event that you could forgive the shortcomings and flaws.I saw this version when first released and recently stumbled across it again and decided it was worth a second viewing. Suffice to say I was both impressed and appalled.The plot has understandably moved on in the 20+yrs since the first TV adaption, however its gotten itself lost somewhere thanks to the writers inabilty to keep the characters and situations both exciting and likable, but most of all believable - remember these are supposed to represent realistic people albeit in an alternative now/near future. Instead there are simply too many characters who insist on ignoring even the most blatant self imposed sensibilities and rules and instead do unnecessary, risky, incomprehensible and too often dangerous things that even a person in shock or suffering anxiety and loss would think twice about. And once you add in absurd events, ridiculous coincidences, and ill thought-out consequences it negates so many of the shows positives.Many others have listed or noted the weaker subplots, scenes, and characterisations so I'll pick out just a few that erked me early on - in fact lets just stick with the main character intros:1) Torrence (played by a quietly menacing but bored looking and slightly out of place Eddie Izzard) waking up in the plane after the passengers and crew have been blinded and it threatens lose control. He simply reacts like hes seen it all before - there's no panicking or asking questions but instead calmly grabs inflatable vests from under a few seats and wedges himself in the toilet (nowhere near enough to make a difference btw even if the crash itself isn't so violent it kills him). And when the plane crashes in the middle of London not only is he alive but also he's miraculously virtually alone. Now I'll let them off to a point as its required for the plot, except he's barely shaken or injured yet his clothes are tattered, torn and blackened - yet a moment later he's smashing a shop window for a suit just as every plane crash survivor does.2) In the meantime Bill is recovering from a close call with a Triffid sting - just as per original, only altered to suit. However the manner he received the sting is ridiculous having handed his glasses to a colleague as she is held hostage in a Triffid farm. As its later shown by the bodies that stings to the face in general can kill the question is if Triffids are so dangerous with their stings why only glasses and not a full mask? And with high fences, secure buildings and armed security (in a UK non-military/government farm!) how did the intruded get so far in the first place? 3) Our heroine Jo, a news reporter, comes out of the underground having miraculously been saved her sight my being ordered to change location by produced. This I'll accept as luck, however the aforementioned plane crash happnes right above her head yet she appears to be the only survivor from the underground, which is doubly unfortunate considering any others would be equally 'lucky' to still retain their sight. She doesn't even seem to look around other than at her apparently dead cameraman (who she does nothing more than glance at). Surely as an outdoor reporter she would be a little more observant even if shook up - obviously not tho as she soon proclaims "I thought I was the only one" when she bumps in to Bill.I feel the only character who comes out of his first scene with any credibility is Corker who like the older version remains tough, resolute, caring, but shortsighted - although why he's suddenly an American and a Major and dressed like a WW2 airman seems odd (pandering to the US audience? or just another unnecessary change to the original?)Its a pity there are so many points to highlight as it could have been so much better. I feel the writers have made a mess keeping the rewrite true to the original but relevant to modern audiences. The characters are forced to stumble over a sometimes terrible script that misses the point on too many occasions, and on more than one is simply absurd. The altered plot is lazy and at times unwiedly. Compared to the almost 'scripted reality' feel of the original this is written and produced as a more dramatic affair but comes over as far less believable even taking in to account the SciFi genre.Just a couple more quickies:Updated Triffids. More menacing but rather more unreal than those of old.Also Terrance. Whilst Izzrad is suitably menacing the actual character feels wrong and its not only his entrance but also his quick rise to major player status that has changed.To sign off there is that one last biggie that isn't just annoying but downright stupid - and I mean worse than the tree climbing Triffids - those awful Tribal Masks and the idea that a little Triffid 'blood' will suddenly make you safe from attack!!! ... Whilst i find the remake fine I still find the original with its older, simpler style more enjoyable. It just seemed to capture the post-apoas well yet in a far less in-your-face manner.Will there be another version made sometime in the future. I doubt it, at least not for a good while, but if so I sincerely hope it's far more like 1981 that 2009...

The premise of this mini-series is the world is harnessing the oil from a carnivorous slow-moving plant for fuel. They have these plants that blind people before eating them contained in farms. Then comes the solar flares that blinds everybody who stares at them. Apparently everything wants to blind us. There are some survivors who didn't get blinded played by Joely Richardson, Dougray Scott, Jason Priestley, and Eddie Izzard.The premise has two sci-fi creations. That's usually one too many. And that's before Eddie Izzard survive a plane crash by piling a bunch of floatation vests in the washroom. How he walks away is pure make believe. And what about the rest of the world? I'm sure there are whole sections of the world that was sleeping through the event. The problematic setups do pile on. If you're willing to forget all the problems with the setup, then the movie is acceptable apocalyptic TV fare. But that's asking too much for me.

I started seeing "The Day of the Triffids" with great expectations of a good sci-fi film. The beginning of the story recalls "Blindness" with most of the population blind. However, differently from José Saramago's novel, London and the rest of the world do not have a mysterious outbreak of blindness but they are affected by a solar storm that blinds everyone that was looking at the phenomenon. Therefore the story is too ridiculous from the very beginning, disregarding that part of the worldwide population would be sleeping or in places protected by the sun. How a scum like Torrence could become a leader? The lame dialogs and situations seem to be written by morons or believing that the viewers are morons. My vote is three.Title (Brazil): "O Dia Final" ("The Final Day")

When I was little I saw the 1981 triffids version on TV. We are now a couple of years later and arrived in remake hell. So before I start mumbling that in the old days things were better ( in most cases they were) and showing everybody I am getting old lets begin.What I remember from that "old" version was the sense of dread when ordinary people are confronted with extra ordinary things. Combined with the helplessness the blind had confronted with the scary looking plants that so slowly but so surely came and came was enough to keep the memory vivid even after all these years. Ah well, you know how it goes when you are about 8 or 9 and you managed to convince your parents to stay up just for a little while.anyway, back to remake hell, or in other words the 2009 version of the triffids. Away are the Venus flytrap like plants that were - I confess- rather rubbery like but still very menacing. We now have triffids that are pure cgi and have tentacles. I guess a new and improved model. We have the regular band of nobody's you don't give a crap about and the most cursed sin of all, not enough triffid action. Basically the triffids feel like an afterthought..stumbling around here and there but never menacing. No this film focuses on the breakdown of the world as we know it which is good but basically the only thing that happened was that everyone who saw the comet went blind. This of course isn't a pleasant fate but where are my beloved triffids. This whole affair felt like a soap opera most of the times. a couple of good scenes in the beginning and a good villain hamming it up makes a rather long and boring watch. and what the hell was that guy from 90210 doing in this film?? Good thing he brought his leather pilot jacket because, well he is a pilot of course.. bleh.And a rather noteworthy choice.. in the old film they used flamethrowers on these nasty triffids. In this film however they use handguns and machine guns on them... I mean, if you do that you deserve to be whipped by these plants. There is a hilarious scene near the end where the bad guys empty clip after clip on these plants with little result but they keep doing it anyway. CGI fire a bit too expensive people?And realize that if you are in an airplane that is about to go down in an urban area the only thing you have to do is to steal life jackets, inflate them in the bathroom of the plane and you are all set...which leads to a funny scene with a plane in the background broken in half after crashing a building and our main villain leaving with a couple of scratches on his face.. give me a break here!!The final head shake came when the remaining survivors escape the triffids by... ah well.. the hell with it, its so crap you have to see it to believe it. it is kinda heartwarming however that our main character connected to his inner child just in time..ooh the terror of remake hell.So a warm advice, for the people who love the 1981 version, rent or download this version and have the fast forward button handy.. and just ponder while fast-forwarding how old you are with a smile.