A young solicitor travels to a remote village where he discovers the vengeful ghost of a scorned woman is terrorizing the locals. The Woman in Black is a stylish and well written drama, thriller that succeeds thanks to a very good perfomance by Daniel Radcliffe. The film sure has some scenes that are a bit predictable for sure but the ending was pretty damn good as a twist but also haunting in a sense of a way. The direction was also pretty good and the rest of the cast does a very good and well done job as well definitely see it if you ever find it on dvd. (7/10)

It is great to see Harry ... uhmmm ... Daniel has grown up and takes on more serious roles. This movie transports the feeling of the early 1900s very well and the creepy scenes are quite good. Daniel Radcliffe and Ciarán Hinds have an amazing chemistry while acting and also the old house looks impressive. On the negative we have, once again, annoyingly loud and often false jump scares, who ruin the experience a lot. Definetely worth a watch, allthough I am a little disappointed. After all, I expected a little more from director James Watkins, who also did the amazing Eden Lake movie back in 2008.

A young lawyer visits a remote village, sent by his firm, in order to complete a series of paperwork. There, he's confronted with a ghost which, with every apparition, takes the life of local children as revenge for some gruesome past events. He starts investigating but the whole world turns upside down when he discovers that his own son is in grave danger.Although interesting as a base idea, it isn't able to keep you attracted as the story unravels, the main character being literally chasing shadows most of the movie, mainly with no results. It has a very dark and spooky atmosphere, almost perfect for this type of movie but its actions are far from pleasing. Besides some scarce dialogue and frightening encounters, almost nothing interesting happens. You want to find out how it ends but it's a bit hard to endure basically the same thing, repeating over and over again.It is grim, it is sinister at times and it has a catchy plot, but its course of events is a bit letdown, not to mention the unsatisfactory finale which, in my opinion, makes the whole struggle before it simply pointless. An average movie after all.

In the modern time i struggle to find a genuinely terrifying and enjoyable film. This film is brilliant at creating with intense build ups and bone chilling scenes. As it follows the novel by the author Susan Hill, it gives its own twists to allow its own originality.So do not decline watching this film because you think you know what happens. CGI is used in many cases however it is not over used yet can look slightly silly in same cases. The figure of the woman was well portrayed as unknown and the pale scarred face was particularly sinister especially when it adapted into the environment of multiple scenes. The Gothic, Victorian theme gave it a constant feel of uneasiness and the atmosphere uplifted a very miserable emotion by using foggy,rainy weather and other atmospheric details. Daniel Radcliffe playing as the main character Arthur Kipps was a well developed character and showed great faces of fear and other emotions to analyse to you watching how he is feeling and also adds towards the extreme intensity of the film. At some point i do feel as if the music was slightly over the top especially to uproar jump scares.To conclude this, i believe this to be a very thrilling and scary movie which is unique in many ways. I would definitely recommend this to a horror or Gothic enthusiast.