My annoyance of this film to me is the opening section of the main character as a kid. The child gives a cringe worthy performance especially during scenes with the dad. He doesn't show any sense of emotion in these scenes and just seems bored. Most of the performances are pretty TV movie like. I also found a lot of editing problems with this movie. One part in particular was edited very fast and just looked sloppy. The cinematography was pretty weak also. The feew things I did like about this movie was Dennis Quaid's performance and the chemistry between him and the son near the end of the film.

Didnt really get it. Straight away could tell the main guy hasnt really acted before. Very long, boring and at part thought "well i bet it didnt happen like that" Dont get the good reviews.

I was deeply moved by this film. At the end when he began to sing the song I was moved to tears imagining what my mother experienced when she went home to be with the Lord. In fact, it brings tears now thinking of it. Grateful this film has brought to light the fact that it is never too late to turn our lives around. His hand is reaching out for us........

There is a certain dishonesty about a film biography that leaves out one of the pieces of the puzzle of a man's life. In the case of "I Can Only Imagine," we have a conventional portrait of a wife batterer and a child abuser in the figure of washed up football star Arthur Millard, resulting in years of anguish for his gifted son to try to come to terms with his dad. But the film does not tell us that Mr. Milliard was seriously injured when he was struck by a diesel truck while working for the Texas highway system. After awakening from an eight-week coma, the man was never the same, due to brain damage. The details about trauma to the temporal lobe and mood changes are touched upon in the bonus track of DVD of "I Can Only Imagine." But that part of the story is left out of the film itself.The background above is not intended to give the abusive father a free pass. But it does suggest that the film is a whitewash because it chooses not to offer the total picture of the Millard family. There is no doubt that young Bart Millard was a horribly abused child, but one with tremendous resourcefulness and survival skills.One of those skills was the childlike ability to imagine. The act of fantasizing removed the child from his terrifying environment. But it also sparked his creative energies, leading to accomplished work in sketching and, above all, in the expression of music. The music Bart loved was inspirational. It was also escapist, saving the child's sanity. It also culminated in the blockbuster song that is the title of this film.The film is also successful in dramatizing the power of forgiveness, as Bart's forgiveness of his dad relieved the debilitating incompleteness of his life. The story was well told and superbly performed by a gifted singer-actor. Another strong character development was the gravel-voiced manager who believed in Bart both as a singer and as a human being.But the one nagging criticism of this film remains: Why didn't the filmmakers reveal the truth about the father's accident? If Mr. Millard indeed had permanent brain damage, leading to violent behavior, then his transformation through Christianity into the man who could win back the love of his son was even more remarkable. Were the filmmakers wary that the focus of the film could shift too far afield from the son's hit record to the father's miraculous transformation? As the real Bart Millard observes in a brief sound byte, in the bonus track: "If the Gospel can change that dude, it change anybody."